John Broskie's Guide to Tube Circuit Analysis & Design

   Post 247                                                                     21 October 2012


RMAF 2012
Another year, another trip down to Denver for the Rocky Mountain Audio Festival (RMAF). Last year's RMAF held fewer attendees than the year before and this year fewer still. But much like last year, the same number of show rooms were filled. Three years ago, just the aged, male, retired-with-time-to-kill, audiophiles showed up on the opening day, a Friday, accompanied by younger men and a few women (dragged along by boyfriends and husbands) on Saturday and Sunday. This time, the same gray- and white-haired audiophiles arrived for Friday, but many of them didn't bother showing up the next day; nor were they replaced by hoards of younger folk the next day. In fact, many of the famous, such as Joe Roberts, who always attend didn't this time. Some couldn't because they had died, such as Arthur Loesch, which saddened me, as I had met him last year and I looked forward to talking to him again this year. (He positively glowed with a sweet gentleness that only the saintly and very young can do.) As I said my goodbye to a wizened audiophile, ending with a "See you next year," I couldn't help but think: perhaps.

Fewer attendees can have its silver lining, as it will result in less noise, less door openings, less of a wait at the elevators. Of course, for those showing, fewer ears disappoints greatly. Gray shadows, however, overwhelmed silver linings. I, and just about everyone I spoke to, sensed something ominously wrong this year, something beyond audio's uncertain future. The gentle, tame, and lamb-like audiophiles were not alone, as the aggressive, grasping, and rapacious salesmen stalked the showrooms and halls in search of prey. This is nothing new, but the larger ratio between wolves to sheep made the wolves easier to spot. Moreover, the wolves were hungry. In a packed elevator, seven silent sheep listened to three wolves bemoan the scarce and skinny wallets to be had. In years past, they would have talked about the wife and kids—but then, in years past, their bellies would have been full. I am not talking about the designers, the owners, and the hangers on, but that breed apart, the salesmen, slick and smiling, with darting eyes, as predatory as they are shameless. No doubt, wherever there are expensive trinkets to sell, these mercenaries of merchandise will be found. And with turntables and loudspeakers that require a second mortgage to buy, these rapacious salesmen are not hard to find, alas.

 

Best Sound at RMAF
In general, I was not that impressed. Of course, such a venue is profoundly ill-suited to serious listening and quality sound reproduction. The rooms are too small and too crowded with both people and equipment. The Brits were on to something when they demanded single-speaker listening, as filling a room with unused speakers just muddies the sonic presentation due to the sympathetic vibrations and resonances introduced by other speakers. And once again, the simple binary result obtained: solid-state or tube sound. No matter how good the solid-state equipment sounded, I quickly grew weary of the sound; no matter how bad the tube equipment sounded, I was compelled to listen a little longer. And, yes, there are bad-sounding tube products. Just adding some glow to a ill-thought-out product does not transform it into audio jewel.

By the end of my last day there, I was more than a little bored and irked by the lousy music and the few good music selections being beaten to death from their repeated playing. It was close to closing time and I forced myself to walk into another showroom. I am, however, absolutely glad that I did. In Room 1009 of the Marriott Tower, I discovered Triode Corporation and Acoustic Zen products.

Triode Corporation makes a beautiful parallel, single-ended, 845-based power amplifier. This amplifier powered Acoustic Zen Crescendo speakers.

The resulting sound was breathtakingly natural. It flowed with ease and grace, pouring out the best sound I have heard at any audio show—and I have been to plenty. At first, I was startled, much as if I had found true love in the wrong place or honesty in a used car lot. Who would ever expect to hear blissful music reproduction at an audio show? Not me. But there it was, supple, natural, effortless. I wanted to find something wrong with it. Surely the highs were truncated, but they weren't. Well, the bass must have been a tad thin, but it wasn't. After days of listening to meretricious sound systems—by the way, "meretricious" does not mean deserving of merit, just the opposite—I had grown accustomed to boom and sizzle. Real bass and real highs, like real inner worth, are not showy. Here is an analogy. Long ago a friend told me that his girlfriend was perfectly lovely, which surprised him greatly.

He had seen her many times before, behind the counter of his favorite coffee shop, but she never dazzled him. One day they actually spoke, beyond greetings and chit chat, and found that they had much in common. Soon they were dating. Then, one day, he realized that she was perfectly formed and that not one aspect of her could be altered without harm to the perfection she exemplified. For example, her hair was brown, not golden blonde or fiery red or raven black, just brown; but changing her hair to one these other colors would only diminish her beauty. She was neither tall, nor short, neither skinny, nor rounded, just medium height and build. Yet, he could not imagine any improvement from her toes to her head, as she didn't need any—all was in proportion and harmony. My friend was troubled because he thought he desired and had hunted for someone flashier, sexier, something more obvious, such as large fake breasts and bottled blonde hair. He was also disturbed that he didn't see how truly lovely she was at first—was he really that shallow? In many ways, he had spent a life being trained not to see the perfect female form in its natural splendor.

Well, I wondered how many had walked into this same room and heard the same glorious sound and yawned. "Where's the boom and sizzle?" they would ask and leave.

I am a huge fan of transmission-line loudspeaker cabinets and I have built many. So, I am doubly embarrassed for not having instantly appreciated the fine bass from the Acoustic Zen Crescendo speakers, a transmission-line enclosure. (When I was a college student, a famous audio reviewer dropped by to hear my famous dual transmission-line sub-woofers. He wasn't impressed—at first. The speakers were as large as a coffin and weighed twice as much, so he expected SPecTacUlar sound. Instead, natural bass filled the room. But once the recording of Mahler's 3rd hit its deepest notes, he nearly doubled over, as if he had been punched in the stomach. I am lucky he didn't have a spontaneous bowel movement. The sub-woofer didn't create bass where there was none, but if the recording held true deep bass, it reproduced it faithfully.)

I am glad that I didn't stroll into this amazing room on the first day, as it would make all the other rooms sound even worse. Okay, I better back off a bit. To be honest, there was more good sound than worse sound at the show. Some of it very good indeed. It is just that the Triode Corporation and Acoustic Zen room held magic, something that was missing in all the other rooms I visited, alas.

Indeed, I thought the new Martin Logan speakers sounded quite promising and I absolutely fell in love with two mini monitors from England, which sounded as good as they looked.

At a much lower price point, the KEF LS50 won my heart and ears. This little speaker can dance. Pick your five favorite audio adjectives and they probably will apply to the LS50 speakers, great imaging, articulate, quick and agile—even big bass. I was convinced that a subwoofer hid behind curtains, but the LS50s provided the only bass. Amazing. The adjective that I found myself using was "fun." These are fantastically fun speakers.

Being little high-tech wonders, the LS50s are filled with innovations, such as soft ports, advanced materials, and a coincident drivers (the tweeter sits at the center of the woofer). They only cost $1500 the pair; and if they could fit in my Christmas stocking, there is nothing that I would prefer finding inside.

 

 

A Good Omen, Perhaps?
After attending a funeral or an audio show, it is easy to be pessimistic. I noted, however, something that might count as an encouraging sign of better times to come. Babes. Sexy women in big ads. Before you turn me into the federal insensitivity police, hear me out. In David McCullough's book, 1776, he points out how the British army welcomed news of rapes by its soldiers as a sign of the army's vitality, although they shot the guilty soldiers. Well, I was surprised to see several big posters displaying audio gear and babes. Think about it, the odd thing is that the dog didn't bark, that the makers of audio gear, knowing that 99.99% of their customers are male, do not adorn all their ads in sexy women. Maybe Eric Barbour is right and most audiophiles are not all that manly? Car nuts certainly suffer no compunction at emblazoning their ads with babes.

Maybe this harkens a return of animal spirits in audio.

 

High-Gain Tube Circuits
Some audio applications require gain, lots of it. Phono preamps and microphone preamplifiers immediately come to mind, but there are other needs for high gain. For example, if the circuit employs a negative feedback loop, it is the unused gain that powers the feedback. In other words, the more open-loop gain, the more feedback, and the lower the distortion and output impedance. Other uses might a be a hot linestage. I have long argued that line stages usually offer too much voltage gain, that most power amplifiers require only 1Vpk to be brought to full power. But there are setups that require much more than +20dB (times 10) of gain to achieve the 1Vpk of output. For example, a phono preamp that bellowed with a high-output moving magnet cartridge, might only whisper with a moving-coil pickup. In this case, a line stage with a gain of +30dB or, even, +40dB might be needed. In addition, certain hybrid power amplifiers might require a high-gain, tube based input stage, because the amplifier can swing big voltages into the speakers.

The Aikido topology delivers a gain equal to about half of the mu of the input tube used. For example, a 12AX7 input tube presents a mu of 100, so a gain of x50 (+34dB) can be realized. While this seems like plenty, more gain may be needed. We could bypass the bottom cathode resistor in the input stage, but this will only increase the gain to about 60 to 70.

(Note the 20k & 10k power-supply-noise voltage-divider resistors, which are just guess-estimates on my part.)

If we need more gain, something like the following can yield close to the mu of the triode used in the first stage. Yes, it does look a lot like an SRPP frontend, but as the first stage doesn't really encounter any load, the circuit cannot push and pull.

Do not forget that the external load is a critical part of the SRPP circuit. In this circuit, the top triode in the first stage functions as something approximating a constant-current source. Okay, why not just use the SRPP stage and forgo the modified cathode follower? Prejudice, prejudice on my part. I always strive to unburden the gain stage entirely, so that its only job is that of developing voltage gain. The SRPP stage performs two tasks: it provides gain and drives the external load. Nonetheless, the maximum gain realizable from an SRPP stage is always less than the mu of the bottom triode used. So, how do we get a gain higher than the triode's mu?

One approach is to cascade two grounded-cathode amplifiers.

The above circuit realizes a gain of about 320 (+50dB), which is plenty—even scary—high. The 17.5µF capacitor was added to achieve one of my signature Aikido-noise-reduction techniques. Of course, some tweaking would be required; if for no other reason that electrolytic capacitors are usually way off their marked values.

 

Aikido Pentode
Another approach is to use a pentode-based gain stage. One of the reasons that pentodes were invented was to get more gain. One of my favorite pentodes is the EF86. The following circuit is an Aikido pentode gain stage. Like its triode-based cousin, the input stage's only job is creating gain and its output stage's jobs are to provide a low output impedance and to scrub away the power-supply noise that input stage leaks profusely. In the case of the pentode input tube, close to 100% of the ripple will appear at its plate, its output.

The Aikido cathode follower (ACF) receives 100% of the power-supply noise at its bottom triode's grid. The result is that noise nulls at the ACF's output. Okay, great, can we stop here? Well, that depends... Note the number of quality signal capacitors within the circuit: three. If you are the type of audio DIYer that buys $140 boutique capacitors, then the following circuit might be more to your wallet's liking.

We have the same number of tubes, but two fewer capacitors. The pentode's 2nd grid (screen grid) is driven by a 12AU7-based cathode follower that injects an optimal amount of power-supply noise, which will achieve a power-supply noise null at the pentode's plate. The second 12AU7-based cathode follower drives the external load. Sweet. Clever. But do not think that we got something for nothing, for we must pay in two ways. The first is that this two-cathode-follower Aikido version will draw more current; second, unlike the first Aikido-pentode circuit, this circuit is tweaky, which means that we must fiddle with the resistor values. (Many audiophiles would sooner fetch moon rocks than figure out new resistor values.) A workaround is to add a potentiometer, which would allow an easy noise null, even with aging pentodes or pentodes from different makers.

 

Aikido Cascode
Another approach is to use the cascode topology, which was created to achieve many of the same goals as a pentode circuit, such as low-input capacitance and high gain, but without the pentode's higher noise.

The following is from the Tube CAD Circuit Guide PDF:

“CASCODE” is a contraction of “CASCaded triodes with the gain of a pentode and the low noise of a triODE.” It is built up of one triode in current series with another triode. The bottom triode’s cathode is grounded and its grid is fed the input signal, while its plate is connected to the cathode of the top tube, whose grid is grounded. This loading of the plate with a cathode prevents the bottom tube’s plate voltage from moving very much in response to signal at its grid, as the top tube cathode functions like a voltage regulator made from a cathode follower. Nonetheless, the bottom tube will experience variations in the current flowing from its cathode to its plate, because of variations in the grid to cathode voltage. The same would also hold true if the triode were connected across a regulated power supply, as a varying grid to cathode voltage would also define a varying plate current in this arrangement. In the cascode circuit, this varying current through the bottom tube must also flow through the top tube, as they are in series. And as the top tube’s plate is loaded with a plate resistor, the varying current defines a varying voltage across its plate resistor, which yields the output voltage and gain of this circuit, which can be considerable. Thus, “the gain of a pentode.”

The circuit, furthermore, functions much like a pentode in that the Miller Effect capacitance is very low, as the grid of the bottom tube is shielded from the inverted amplification at the top tube’s plate. Also like a pentode based circuit, the distortion from this circuit is higher than would have been the case with only one triode. This is because the bottom triode does not experience any of the linearizing effects of running the triode in a closer approximation of a constant current mode, as in the case of a grounded cathode amplifier with a large plate resistor. It differs, however, from the pentode by the fact that there is no grid current flowing into the top triode’s grid as there is with the grid 2 of a pentode and by the fact that the noise is lower than a pentode’s. Thus, “the low noise of a triode.”

The secret behind this circuit is that it is an elaborate attempt to conserve as much of the triode’s transconductance as possible. In a normal grounded cathode amplifier, the plate load resistance subtracts from the effective transconductance of the triode. The plate load resistance added to the plate resistance (rp) and then divided into the mu of the triode determines the transconductance of the triode.

The key word throughout was "transconductance." The cascode circuit does not rely upon the triode's amplification factor (mu or µ), but its transconductance (gm) for gain. The higher the transconductance, the higher the gain.

The problem with the cascode circuit, however, is that it, like the pentode circuit, offers a dismal PSRR. Well, if we can undo the pentode's poor PSRR with an Aikido technique, can we do the same with the cascode? Sure. In fact, the very first issue of the Tube CAD Journal (1999) held an article I wrote on Improving the Cascode's PSRR. Here is the original and ugly GIF schematic.

Since my first rule is let the gain stage develop gain without having to drive any difficult or uncertain load, the following Aikido Cascode circuit will also undo the cascode's poor PSRR and drive external loads with a low output impedance.


The cascode input stage develops a high gain and the ACF output stage scrubs away the power-supply noise.

 

Next Time
I will have more information on the Aikido Cascode and the new PCBs and, of course, new circuits.

 

 

//JRB

     
I know that some readers wish to avoid Patreon, so here is a PayPal button instead. Thanks.

                                 John Broskie

 


Support the Tube CAD Journal

&

get an extremely powerful push-pull tube-amplifier simulator for

Only $19

TCJ Push-Pull Calculator
Version 2


Click on images to see enlargements



TCJ PPC Version 2 Improvements

       Rebuilt simulation engine
       Create reports as PDFs*
       More Graphs 2D/3D*
       Help system added
       Target idle current feature
       Redesigned array creation
       Transformer primary & secondary
              RDC inclusion
       Save user-defined transformer     
              definitions
       Enhanced result display
       Added array result grid

                                       *User definable


TCJ Push-Pull Calculator has but a single purpose: to evaluate tube-based output stages by simulating eight topologies’ (five OTL and three transformer-coupled) actual performance with a specified tube, power supply and bias voltage, and load impedance. The accuracy of the simulation depends on the accuracy of the tube models used and the tube math model is the same True Curves™ model used in GlassWare's SE Amp CAD and Live Curves programs, which is far more accurate than the usual SPICE tube model.

Download or CD ROM
Windows 95/98/Me/NT/2000/XP

For more information, please visit our Web site :
          
www.glass-ware.com

To purchase, please visit our Yahoo Store:
http://store.yahoo.com/glass-ware

 
www.tubecad.com           Copyright © 1999-2012 GlassWare           All Rights Reserved